| Honda | BMW | Comment |
| Looks: | 3 | 3 | Especially women find the Honda cute. BMW has a massive look, but is not a true beauty. |
| Equipment: | 1 | 5 | A wee difference in the options list. See above. |
| Driver´s enviroment | 2 | 5 | BMW truly beautiful. You don´t get lost in the Honda though. Almost everything in the right place. |
| View | 4 | 3 | Upright position in Honda gives very good view. BMW:s boxshape is good too. |
| Space and seatcomfort | 2 | 4 | If you fold down the backseat in Honda and make a twoseater of it, you can get quite a lot of stuff in. Not much seatcomfort though. The BMW is spacious and comfortable. You could wish for a bit more trunkspace if your fuzzy. (Buy a Jetta) |
| Riding comfort, sound level | 1 | 5 | Honda is quite bumpy and uncomfortable. BMW is not. Same with noise. Honda has, BMW hasn´t. |
| On the road | 2 | 4 | Honda a bit nervous. Understeers heavy when wet. BMW feels safer. |
| In the city | 4 | 2 | Honda turns on a dime and can almost be parked across the parking space. Compared with Jazz is BMW like turning a battleship. Servo steering on BMW makes life easier though. Honda dosen´t need it. |
| Engine/gearbox | 3 | 5 | BMW as smooth as they come. Silken wallop. Automatic shifts without notice. Honda easy to change gears and has good clutch. Engine a bit noisy but otherwise OK, both warm and cold. |
| Power | 2 | 4 | One has, the other hasn´t. Mind you, to be honest you´ll get where you´re going almost as quick with the Honda |
| Safety | 1 | 5 | Honda: Your feet is three feet from the front bumper. BMW: You are a bit more protected. |
| Economy | 5 | 1 | BMW: two times the fuel consumtion, three times the insurance, three times the road tax. Honda is a piggy bank. |